Change of variables from Chapter 14 for Math 293

Return to the Topics for Chapter 14 page
Revised July 12, 2012
Some images on this page have been generated via AsciiMathML.js.
For more information see: www.chapman.edu/~jipsen/asciimath.html.

Here is a specific problem:
Find a change of variables for
`2x+3y=4` and `2x+3y=11` and `5x-6y=2` and `5x-6y=9`
To do this let   `u=2x+3y`
`v=5x-6y`
(1)
Let us eliminate `y`
To do this we multiply top equation by `2`
  `2u=4x+6y`
`v=5x-6y`
(2)
Add the two equations to eliminate the y's   `2u + v = 9x` (3)
or   `x = (1/9)(2u +v)` (4)
Then we want to solve for y
We could do this in different ways
  1. we could return to (1) and eliminate x
  2. we could substitute (4) into one of the equations in (1)
We will do the first of these so
multiply the top equation in (1) by 5 and the bottom by -2
  `5u=10x+15y`
`-2v=-10x+12y`
(5)
Add the two equations to eliminate the x's   `5u - 2v = 27y` (6)
or   `y = (1/27)(5u - 2v)` (7)
Return to the original equations, and change variables
`2x+3y=4` yields   `2( (1/9)(2u+v) ) + 3( (1/27)(5u - 2v) ) = 4` (8)
Multiply both sides by 9 to give   `2( 2u+v ) + (5u - 2v) = 36`
`4u + 2v +5u -2v = 36`
`9u = 36`
`u=4`
(9)
`2x+3y=11` yields   `2( (1/9)(2u+v) ) + 3( (1/27)(5u - 2v) ) = 11` (10)
Multiply both sides by 9 to give   `2( 2u+v ) + (5u - 2v) = 99`
`4u + 2v +5u -2v = 36`
`9u = 99`
`u=11`
(11)
`5x-6y=2` yields   `5( (1/9)(2u+v) ) - 6( (1/27)(5u - 2v) ) = 2` (12)
Multiply both sides by 9 to give   `5( 2u+v ) -+ 2(5u - 2v) = 18`
`10u - 5v - 10u + 4v = 18`
`9v = 18`
`v=2`
(13)
`5x-6y=9` yields   `5( (1/9)(2u+v) ) - 6( (1/27)(5u - 2v) ) = 9` (14)
Multiply both sides by 9 to give   `5( 2u+v ) -+ 2(5u - 2v) = 81`
`10u - 5v - 10u + 4v = 81`
`9v = 81`
`v=9`
(15)

Here are images of plots of the original equations and of the transformed versions of the same:

and

We can actually go backwards at this time to find the coordinates of the corners of the parallelogram in the `xy`-plane from the corners of the rectangle in the `uv`-plane: To do this we can use the equations `x=(1/9)(2u+v)` and `y=(1/27)(5u-2v)`.
`(u,v)=(4,2)`
`(x,y)=(10/9,16/27)`
`(u,v)=(4,9)`
`(x,y)=(17/9,2/27)`
`(u,v)=(11,2)`
`(x,y)=(24/9,51/27)`
`(u,v)=(11,9)`
`(x,y)=(31/9,37/27)`

The rectangle in the `uv`-plane is a nice region, namely, it is a 7 by 7 square with area equal to 49 square units. The parallelogram in th `xy`-plane poses challenges in terms of finding its area.

The tansformations that we found, expressed as
`x=(1/9)(2u+v)` and `y=(1/27)(5u-2v)`
can be used to find the Jacobian of `x` and `y` with respect to `u` and `v`.

`(del(x,y))/(del(u,v)) = |[(del x)/(del u),(del x)/(del v)],[(del y)/(del u),(del y)/(del v)]| = (del x)/(del u) (del y)/(del v) - (del y)/(del u) (del x)/(del v) `

`(del(x,y))/(del(u,v)) = |[2/9,1/9],[5/27,(-2)/27]| = 2/9 *(-2)/27 - 1/9 * 5/27 = (-4)/(9*27) - 5/(9*27) = (-9)/(9*27) =-1/27`

Then, the change of variables theorem gives us the general statement

`int_Rintf(x,y)dxdy = int_Sintf(g(u,v),h(u,v))|(del(x,y))/(del(u,v))| du dv`

And, in this particular case, where we know the Jacobian, to find the area of `R` we have `f(x,y)=1` which means that `f(g(u,v),h(u,v))=1` so we are looking at

`int_Rintdxdy = int_Sint|(-1)/27| du dv =|-1/27|int_Sint du dv`

However, as noted above, the area of `S` is 49 square units, so the area of `R` must be `49/27`. Fortunately for us, we have an alternative method of finding the area of `R` so we can check our work. In particular, if we look at the two vectors that form adjacent sides of the parallelogram `R` we can compute the area of the parallelogram by looking at the magnitude of the cross product of those vectors. Using the point `(10/9,16/27,0)` [note that we express this in three dimensions so that we can take a cross-product] as the start of the two vectors, we get the vector to the point `(24/9,51/27,0)` as `(:14/9,35/27,0:)` and the vector to the point `(17/9,2/27,0)` as `(:7/9,(-14)/27,0:)`. The cross product of these two vectors is `(:0,0,(14*14)/(9*27)-(35/27)*(7/9):)` which simplifies to `(:0,0,49/27:)` and the magnitude of that vector is just `49/27`, confirming our earlier work.

©Roger M. Palay
Saline, MI 48176
July, 2012