Now we will repeat the list but with a discussion of how to go about solving such a problem.
1. You are given the slope and the y-intercept, find the equation of the line | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Since we know the slope-intercept form of a linear equation looks like y = mx + b, where m is the slope and b is the second coordinate of the y-intercept, we have been given everything that we need to just write the equation. We just plug in the given values. So, if we are given that the slope is 2/3 and the y-intercept is (0,6) then the equation is y=(2/3)x + 6. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2. You are given the slope and a point on the line, but not the intercept, find the equation of the line | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Knowing the slope but not the y-intercept means tht we could write a portion of the
desired equation, but not all of it. We start with the slopeintercept form
of the equation, y = mx + b, and we substitute the given value of the
slope for m. So, if we are given that the
slope is (-3/4) and that the line contains the point (8,1), then we know that
we could at least write the equation as y = (-3/4)x + b. The other piece
of information is that the point (8,1) is on the line. But that means that the values x=8 and y=1
must make the equation work. Replacing x and y
in the equation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. You are given two points on the line, find the equation of the line | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In this case we are not given the slope and we are not given the y-intercept.
However, if we have two points, we can find the slope of the line between them. The slope between points
(x1,y1)
and (x2,y2) is defined as
The process becomes so straight forward that we can write a program to do this. Such a program, slope.83p for the TI-83 family, is given below.
The program is pretty good, though the output is a bit unpleasant. It is slightly more difficult to obtain nicer looking output on the TI-83 family of calculators. If your calculator has the program TOSTR on it then the program SLOPE1, listed below in three parts, produces better output.
A comparison of the two programs will show that the SLOPE1 program is merely an extension of the SLOPE program with the added lines merely making the output nicer. A sample run of the SLOPE1 program follows:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4. You are told that the line is horizontal and given a point on the line, find the equation of the line | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A horizontal line ahas a slope of 0 so the slope-intercept equation becomes y = 0x + +b which we can simplify to y = b. The value of b has to be the same value as the second coordinate of the given point. [If it were not the smae then the slope between the y-intercept and the given point could not be 0.] Therefore, we can use that second coordinate in place of the constant b and just write the equation. Thus, the equation of the horizontal line through (5,7) must be y = 7. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5. You are told that the line is vertical and given a point on the line, find the equation of the line | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vertical lines have undefined slope. In this case, the first coordinate of everypoint on the line is some constant value. If we are given a point on the line then the first coordinate of that point is the value of x that defines the line. We can write the equation in standard form as x 0y = C where C is the first coordinate of the given point. [We make the coefficient of y be 0 so that the value of the y-coordinate for any point is immaterial to the equation. Also, note that since the slope is undefined, we cannot write the equation in slope-intercept form.] Thus, the equation of the vertical line through (5,7) must be x = 5. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6. You are told that the line is parallel to a line given in slope-intercept form, and that the new line contains a point, find the equation of the line | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This is just a wordy version of an earlier problem.
Parallel lines have the same slope.
We are given the slope-intercept form of a line, therefore must be given the desired slope for our new line.
Thus, we know the slope and a point on the line, a problem we already addressed. To find the equation of a line parallel to y=(-2/3)x + 8 and that contains the point (-6,5) we really want to find the equation of a line with slope (-2/3) and containing the point (-6,5). As before, the slope intercept form of the answer can be partially filed out as y = (-2/3)x + b. We know that (-6,5) must make the equation valid. Substituting -6 for x and 5 for y we get 5 = (-2/3)(-6) + b which simplifies to 5 = 4 + b and that becomes 1 = b. Finally, we fill out the slope-intercept form with the the known values and have y = (-2/3)x + 1. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7. You are told that the line is perpendicular to a line given in slope-intercept form and that the line contains a point, find the equation of the line | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
With the exception of horizontal and vertical lines, two lines are perpendicula if and only if the
product of their slopes is -1. This means that a line with slope (3/5) is perpendicular to a line
with slope (-5/3). Thus, given a slope-intercept equation for a line we can find the slope of that
line and from that value we compute its negative reciprocal which becomes the slope of our new line. And, again,
we have changed this problem into an earlier one since we now know the slope of the line and
a point on the line. For example, to find the equation of a line that is perpendicular to the line y = (3/5)x + 7 and contains the point (-9,-7) we know that we want to find the equation of a line with slope (-5/3) and containing (-9,-7). The partially completed slope-intercept form of the answer will be y = (-5/3)x + b. We know that (-9,-7) must make the equation valid. Substituting -9 for x and -7 for y we get -7 = (-5/3)(-9) + b which simplifies to -7 = 15 + b and that becomes -22 = b. Finally, we fill out the slope-intercept form with the the known values and have y = (-5/3)x - 22. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8. You are told that the line is parallel to a line given in standard form and that the new line contains a point, find the equation of the line | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A short answer to this kind of problem is to change the standard form
of the given equation into slope-intercept form, thus changing the problem into
one we have examined already. That will work! However, if we do this using the standard form we see that:
By = (-A)x + C y = (-A/B)x + (C/B). For example, to find the equation of a line that is parallel to 3x + 7y = -12 and that goes through (4,5) we know that the answer will look like 3x + 7y = C, and we know that we can substitute 4 for x and 5 for y. This gives us 3(4) + 7(5) = C, but that simplifies to 12 + 35 = C which resolves to 47 = C. Therefore, the desired answer is 3x + 7y = 47. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9. You are told that the line is perpendicular to a line given in standard form and that the new line contains a point, find the equation of the line | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Just as in the previous section,
a short answer to this kind of problem is to change the standard form
of the given equation into slope-intercept form, thus changing the problem into
one we have examined already. That will work! However, if we do this using the standard form we see that:
By = (-A)x + C y = (-A/B)x + (C/B). For example, to find the equation of a line that is perpendicular to 3x + 7y = -12 and that goes through (4,5) we know that the answer will look like 7x - 3y = C, and we know that we can substitute 4 for x and 5 for y. This gives us 7(4) - 3(5) = C, but that simplifies to 28 - 15 = C which resolves to 13 = C. Therefore, the desired answer is 7x - 3y = 13. |
©Roger M. Palay
Saline, MI 48176
August, 2010