HST 108 Film Review
Guidelines
1. Source for your review: the main source for
your review MUST be the film about which you are
writing. You may use supporting information from the
textbook and lecture, if necessary. You should NOT
use online sources, especially other film reviews.
Borrowing information from other film reviews will result
in a failing grade.
2. Type of review: your review must be a critical
analysis that includes the following:
a. brief summary of the information presented in the film
[Prove to me that
you paid attention during the film.]
b. brief analysis of the information presented in the film
[Prove to me that
you have thought critically about the issues discussed in
the film.]
c. your judgment of the film
[Let me know what
you thought about the quality of the film. Was is
good, bad, mediocre?
Was it highly entertaining or ridiculously boring?
Was it just too dramatic?
Would you recommend that I continue to use the film in
this class?]
4. Format of review: Typed and double-spaced in 12-point font.
5. Due date: reviews must be turned in at the
beginning of the class IMMEDIATELY following the class in
which the final film was shown. See your class
schedule for the exact date. (Reviews may be turned
in early.)
6. Late reviews: these will NOT be accepted and no
extensions will be given.
7. Plagiarism: as indicated on the syllabus, plagiarism will not be tolerated. If you plagiarize, you will be referred to the Dean of Humanities, Social and Behavioral Sciences for disciplinary action. Such action will likely include failing the course. You are plagiarizing someone's work (book, journal, newspaper, magazine, webpage, film, etc.) when you take their work and put it into your own work (either paraphrased or word-for-word) without citing it (i.e., telling me where you got it). The rule of thumb for verbatim usage of someone's work is the following: if you are taking four or more words in a row, you must enclose them in quotation marks.